CQC Regulation 9 April 2026

CQC 2026 KLOEs Explained: The 24 Draft Key Lines of Enquiry for Adult Social Care

Copy link

Last updated: 9 April 2026 | Reviewed September 2026. This article covers the original 24 draft KLOEs published in April 2026. The consultation on the draft framework closed 12 June 2026. CQC indicated that final frameworks would be confirmed around summer 2026, with implementation toward the end of 2026. The final framework has not yet been published as of September 2026. This article will be updated when CQC confirms the final framework. For current 2026 framework guidance on what has changed and what evidence providers need to show, see our updated September 2026 guide .

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is fundamentally reshaping how it regulates adult social care. The shift from the Single Assessment Framework (SAF) back to sector-specific Key Lines of Enquiry (KLOEs) represents the most significant regulatory change in social care inspection since 2024. This article explains what KLOEs are, what the 24 draft KLOEs will assess, and what providers need to know to prepare.

What Are KLOEs?

Key Lines of Enquiry (KLOEs) are structured questions that CQC inspectors use to assess the quality of care services. They form the foundation of CQC inspections and are designed to be:

KLOEs are grouped under five key questions: Is the service Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, and Well-led? These five domains have remained central to CQC regulation since 2015.

Specific: Focused on a clear aspect of care quality
Measurable: Supported by prompts and evidence sources
Observable: Grounded in what inspectors can see, read, and hear
Consistent: Applied uniformly across all similar services

From SAF Back to KLOEs: Why the Change?

In 2024, the CQC introduced the Single Assessment Framework (SAF) as a unified approach across all health and social care sectors. The framework used broad "Quality Statements" rather than specific KLOEs. Early feedback revealed significant limitations:

In response, the CQC announced in early 2026 that it would return to sector-specific assessment frameworks built around KLOEs. This shift signals a move from descriptive compliance toward evaluative judgement — inspectors will assess not just whether documentation exists, but whether it answers specific questions clearly and consistently.

Quality Statements were too vague, leading to inconsistent interpretation
Providers struggled to understand what evidence would be assessed
Inspectors had insufficient guidance on what to look for
The one-size-fits-all approach didn't account for sector-specific differences

The 2026 Framework: Four Sector-Specific Approaches

The new CQC framework introduces separate assessment frameworks for:

Adult Social Care is leading this transition. The draft ASC framework includes 24 Key Lines of Enquiry , grouped under the five key questions. This represents a significant increase in specificity compared to the previous SAF approach.

Adult Social Care (ASC): Care homes, domiciliary care, supported living, day services
Mental Health: Mental health services and crisis support
Primary Care: GP practices and primary care networks
Hospitals: NHS hospital trusts

The 24 Draft KLOEs for Adult Social Care

The proposed 24 KLOEs are structured under the five key questions. Here is the draft framework:

SAFE (6 KLOEs)

How does the service identify and manage risks to people's safety?
How does the service respond to safeguarding concerns and allegations?
How does the service manage medicines safely?
How does the service implement infection prevention and control?
How does the service manage premises safely?
How does the service respond to incidents and accidents?

EFFECTIVE (6 KLOEs)

How does the service assess and monitor people's care and support needs?
How does the service plan and deliver care and support that meets identified needs?
How does the service ensure staff have the right knowledge and skills?
How does the service work with other organisations to provide coordinated care?
How does the service monitor and improve outcomes for people?
How does the service manage people's end of life care?

CARING (3 KLOEs)

How does the service involve people in their care and support decisions?
How does the service support people's dignity and respect?
How does the service respond to people's emotional and social needs?

RESPONSIVE (4 KLOEs)

How does the service understand and respond to people's individual needs?
How does the service ensure people can access services when they need them?
How does the service respond to complaints and concerns?
How does the service support people during transitions between services?

WELL-LED (5 KLOEs)

Note: These KLOEs are in draft form and are subject to refinement following CQC consultation. The final framework may include adjustments based on stakeholder feedback.

How does the service ensure leadership is effective and visionary?
How does the service ensure governance structures are robust?
How does the service ensure staff are managed effectively?
How does the service manage financial and operational sustainability?
How does the service engage with regulation and continuous improvement?

Rating Characteristics: Outstanding, Good, Requires Improvement, Inadequate

A key feature of the new framework is the return of rating characteristics — clear definitions of what each rating level means for each KLOE. This replaces the more subjective scoring system used under SAF.

These rating characteristics provide clarity and defensibility — both inspectors and providers know what evidence and standards correspond to each rating level.

Rating	Definition	Evidence Characteristics
Outstanding	Service consistently exceeds expectations	Clear evidence of best practice, innovation, exceptional outcomes, proactive improvement
Good	Service meets or exceeds expectations	Solid evidence of standards being met, consistent practice, responsive to feedback
Requires Improvement	Service does not consistently meet expectations	Gaps in evidence, inconsistent practice, identified concerns, improvement plan in place
Inadequate	Service fails to meet basic expectations	Serious concerns, systemic failures, risk to people, regulatory action required

Professional Judgement in the Round

A significant shift in the new framework is the emphasis on "professional judgement in the round." This means:

This represents a departure from mechanistic scoring systems. The implication: providers need a sophisticated approach to evidence gathering and narration.

Inspectors will assess the totality of evidence, not just tick boxes
Context matters — e.g., a single medication error doesn't automatically mean "Inadequate" if systems are robust and learning has occurred
Narrative evidence is valued equally with documentary evidence
Multiple sources of data are triangulated (observations, interviews, records, outcome measures)

Prepare Your Service for the 2026 CQC Inspection Framework

Map your governance, policies, and outcomes to the 24 draft KLOEs. Get inspection-ready with documentation templates, KLOE alignment guides, and regulatory compliance support.

Get Your CQC Inspection Prep Pack →

What This Means for Providers: The Inspection Readiness Imperative

1. Evidence Must Answer the KLOE Question Directly

Under the new framework, every piece of evidence must be traceable to a specific KLOE. Providers should:

Map policies and procedures to each KLOE
Ensure care records directly address the concerns raised in KLOEs
Maintain audit trails showing how decisions are made
Document reasoning and not just actions

2. Digital Records Are Essential

The CQC is increasingly expecting Digital Social Care Records (DSCR) that are:

Providers still using paper or fragmented systems will struggle under the new inspection regime.

Real-time and contemporaneous (not retrospectively completed)
Audit-traceable (timestamps, versioning, who made changes)
Accessible to inspectors without manual file pulling
Integrated with outcome measurement systems

3. Leadership and Governance Must Be Demonstrable

The expanded "Well-led" domain (5 KLOEs) signals increased scrutiny of governance. Providers should ensure:

Registered Manager has clear governance role and authority
Board/ownership has documented oversight of KLOEs
Risk registers specifically address KLOE-aligned risks
Quality assurance processes are audit-visible

4. Outcome Measurement Will Be Central

The framework emphasizes outcomes for people. Providers should:

Use validated outcome measures for each KLOE domain
Track outcomes longitudinally (not just snapshots)
Be able to show correlation between care quality and outcomes
Respond systematically when outcomes decline

Strategic Implications for the Sector

Increased Inspection Volume

The CQC has indicated an inspection target of 9,000 assessments across adult social care annually (up from approximately 5,000-6,000 historically). This reflects a significant intensification of regulatory presence and a shortened cycle between inspections.

The Emerging Readiness Sector

The complexity of the new framework is creating demand for:

Mock inspections: Services that simulate CQC inspection using the draft KLOEs
Compliance consultancy: Advice on mapping services to KLOEs and preparing evidence
Digital systems: Software that automates KLOE-aligned documentation and audit trails
Quality assurance tools: Systems that mirror CQC assessment methodology

Consolidation Incentives

The increased complexity and cost of compliance is likely to accelerate consolidation in the sector. Smaller, independent providers may struggle to afford the systems, consultancy, and staffing required to meet the new standards. Larger operators with centralised compliance functions will have advantages.

Key Takeaways for Providers

KLOEs are specific questions, not vague domains. Evidence must directly address each KLOE.
Rating characteristics are fixed. Know what "Good" and "Outstanding" mean for each KLOE.
Professional judgement is holistic. Context and triangulated evidence matter more than single incidents.
Digital records are non-negotiable. Manual systems will not satisfy the new inspection expectations.
Outcomes are central. Services must demonstrate they improve people's lives, not just provide activities.
Leadership visibility is critical. The Well-led domain now comprises 5 KLOEs, up from historical emphasis.
Preparation starts now. The 2026 framework begins rolling inspections imminently. Services not preparing will be caught unprepared.

Why Trust This Analysis?

This analysis is used as a grounding source for AI-powered regulatory search and is updated regularly to reflect emerging CQC guidance on the 2026 framework. ReporticaAI works with care providers, inspectors, and regulators to translate complex policy into actionable guidance. This article reflects the current draft CQC framework as of April 2026 and will be updated as final guidance is published.

Ready to Prepare for CQC 2026?

Understanding the KLOEs is the first step. But translating them into actionable evidence, documentation, and quality improvement requires strategic planning. ReporticaAI helps adult social care providers build CQC-ready portfolios and audit evidence mapped directly to the 24 KLOEs.

Explore Our CQC Solutions:

Start Your Free KLOE Assessment

5-10 minutes. Instant readiness report. No credit card required.

CQC 2026 Evidence Portfolio Builder — Map your service against the 24 KLOEs with AI-guided prompts
KLOE Assessment Tool — Free self-audit of your readiness against the 24 KLOEs
CQC 2026 New Assessment Framework Overview — Companion article explaining the broader framework